Friday, April 27, 2012

How many of you were disapointed about the third Spiderman movie?

It was awful, the only good parts were the action scenes! The acting was horrible( like a soap), the parts where he's "evil" with that dumb piece of hair on his forehead were painful to watch!!!! The story line was weak, this was the worst sequel ever! The other two movies were sooo good, what happened????



How many of you were disapointed about the third Spiderman movie?

FINALLY!!!



Someone agrees with me. I've been saying this for the longest time even before the movie came out that it was gonna be a crap-tastic piece of cinematic fecal matter.



But there are still loads of people who delude themselves into thinking that this is the greatest masterpiece out there.



No accounting for taste I guess.



How many of you were disapointed about the third Spiderman movie?

I completely agree. The movie overall was pretty boring. The action scenes were awesome as expected, but the movie was about 40 minutes too long. They needed to cut out some of the stupid singing and dancing in the middle. I almost fell asleep.



How many of you were disapointed about the third Spiderman movie?

some people don't think that is way awful all the way only parts but its others opinion that you want ok



How many of you were disapointed about the third Spiderman movie?

Complete waste of my time. The cooking scene? Lame. Saturday Night Fever scene. Corny and lame. Emo Peter Parker. I wanted to punch him. Crane's destroying buildings. Awesome. Venom. Awesome (although to us non-readers, scratching our heads to the intruduction of the symbiote). Could have been a better movie by cutting out a good 45 minutes to an hour.

No comments:

Post a Comment